download
Full screen

Primates Id code: amd327

Galagonidae

Galagoides thomasi

(Elliot, 1907)

(Eng) Thomas's dwarf galago

(Fre) Galago de Thomas

Taxonomic notes

Still included in G. demidoff by some authors (e.g. Wilson & Reeder, 1993) it was recognised as a fully distinct species by Groves (1974) and this classification has also been adopted by Oates (1996).

IUCN threat category

Lower Risk, least concearn (LR: lc).

Available information

Literature available on this species is limited. The species' ecology was investigated in Makoku (Gabon) by Charles-Dominique (1971; 1977). Information on its habitat and other aspects of the species' ecology, particularly its behaviour, are found in Bourlière (1985) and Eisenberg et al. (1979). Data on its occurrence in the Gold Coast are reported in Booth (1979). General information on its ecology and distribution are reported in Kingdon (1997), Nash et al. (1989) and Stuart & Stuart (1997). Status and threats are discussed in Oates (1996).

Known extent of occurrence

The exact distribution of this species, generally lumped together with G. demidoff, is unclear. Its occurrence Nigeria, Cameroon, former Zaire, Uganda and Angola, in full sympatry with G. demidoff, is reported in Oates (1996) while the species' presence in western Africa, as well as in some central African countries, needs further investigation. Fig. 2.2.9.a was obtained from Kingdon (1997); uncertain records from Mt. Marsabit in Kenya are marked as "possible".

Categorical-discrete (CD) distribution model

This species occurs in low, medium altitude and montane forests; it also inhabits marginal forests (Nash et al., 1989; Rahm & Christiaensen, 1966).

Based on these environmental preferences, the following scores were assigned (Fig. 2.2.9.b) (2.2.9.a):

Score

 

1

Forests.

2

Forest mosaics.

3

Savannas and croplands.

 

suitable

moderately suitable

unsuitable

Total

OCCURRENCE

km2

%

km2

%

km2

%

km2

%

certain

2 041 059

48

923 977

22

1 233 756

29

4 198 792

99

possible

23

0

34

0

27 190

1

27 247

1

Total

2 041 082

48

924 011

22

1 260 946

30

4 226 039

100

Tab 2.2.9.a: Cumulative size (km2) of areas pertaining to each environmental suitability class within the Extent of Occurrence.

Number Patches (NP)

Mean Patch Size (MPS) km2

Patch Size SD (PSSD) km2

Largest Patch Index (LPI) %

Mean Shape Index (MSI)

Area-Weighted Mean Shape Index (AWMSI)

suitable

1 439

1 419

45 267

57.51

1.25

29.19

moderately suitable

3 266

283

4 789

7.78

1.29

11.83

Total AO

1 033

2 872

77 042

82.42

1.28

24.7

Tab 2.2.9.b: Area of Occupancy fragmentation indexes.

Probabilistic-continuous (PC) distribution model

The output of the probabilistic-continuous (PC) distribution model is shown in Fig. 2.2.9.c.

 

Validation

% of EO in sample areas

Number of valid plots

Index of Accordance (%)

8.96

127

61.42

Tab 2.2.9.c: Categorical-discrete (CD) distribution model validation parameters.

Comments and conservation issues

The EO of this species is classified as 48% suitable and 22% moderately suitable, and these results are well supported by the Index of Accordance (61.42%). The two suitability classes combined provide a relatively continuous AO (LPI= 82.42), while the AWMSI indicates a rather articulate shape. Extensive unsuitable areas are shown at the southern and eastern boundaries, while potential available areas outside the known limit are indicated northward, and this pattern is confirmed by the PC model. Less than 4% of the AO is included in existing protected areas. These results, however, are only indicative as the species' distribution and ecology are poorly known and further research is urgent even though it is classified as Lower Risk.

OCCURRENCE

SUITABILITY CLASS

inside

outside

Total

certain

suitable

1.79

46.50

48.30

moderately suitable

0.68

21.18

21.86

unsuitable

1.75

27.45

29.19

possible

suitable

0

0

0

moderately suitable

0

0

0

unsuitable

0.09

0.56

0.64

Total

4.31

95.69

100

Tab 2.2.9.d: Percent of environmental suitability classes within EO (as obtained from the categorical-discrete distribution model) inside and outside the protected areas.

References

Booth A.H. (1979). The distribution of primates in the Gold Coast. In: Sussman R.W. (Ed.). Primate Ecology. Problem-oriented field studies. Wiley, Chichester & New York: chap. 7: 139-154.

Bourlière F. (1985). Primate communities: their structure and role in tropical ecosystems. Int J. Primatol.: 6, 1-26.

Charles-Dominique P. (1971). Eco-éthologie des prosimiens du Gabon. Biol. Gabonica: 7, 121-228.

Charles-Dominique P. (1977). Ecology and Behavior of Nocturnal Primates. Prosimians of Equatorial West Africa. Columbia University Press, New York.

Eisenberg J.F., Muckenhirn N., Rudran R. (1979). The relations between ecology and social structure in primates. [reprinted from Science (1972), 176: 863-874]. In: Sussman R.W. (Ed.). Primate Ecology. Problem-oriented field studies. Wiley, Chichester & New York. chap. 23: 455-484.

Groves C.P. (1974). Taxonomy and phylogeny of prosimians. In: Martin R.D., Doyle G.A., Walker A.C. (Eds). Prosimian Biology. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.

Kingdon J. (1997). The Kingdon field guide to African Mammals. Academic Press, London and New York: Natural World.

Nash L.T., Bearder S.K., Olson T.R. (1989). Synopsis of Galago species characteristics. Int J. Primatol.: 10, 57-80.

Oates J.F. (1996). African Primates Status Survey and Conservation Action plan. IUCN/SSC Primate Specialist Group.

Rahm U., Christiaensen A. (1966). Les mammiferès de l'Ile Idjwi (Lac Kivu, Congo). Les mammifères de la foret equatoriale de l'est du Congo. Ann. Mus. Roy. Afr. Cent.: n° 149.

Stuart C., Stuart T. (1997). Field guide to the larger mammals of Africa. Struik Publishers.

Wilson D.E., Reeder D.M. (Eds) (1993). Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. Second edition. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C.