Artiodactyla Id code: amd154
Bovidae
Cephalophus jentinki
Thomas, 1892
(Eng) Jentink's duiker
(Fre) Céphalophe de Jentink
Taxonomic notes
General agreement exists concerning the taxonomic status of this species (Wilson & Reeder, 1993; East, 1990; Meester & Setzer, 1971).
IUCN threat category
Vulnerable (VU: criteria A1c, C1).
Available information
Information available on the ecology of the Jentink’s duiker is very poor. The species' presence was assessed quite recently in part of Sierra Leone by Davies & Birkenhagen (1990) and Wilson & Wilson (1990). The authors mentioned above also gathered some information on its ecology from local hunters, particularly on habitat preferences and feeding habits. A brief description of the main aspects of the species' ecology and distribution is found in Haltenorth & Diller (1977) and Kingdon (1997). Status and distribution, together with some ecological aspects, are discussed in East (1990).
Known extent of occurrence
One of the larger duikers in Africa, it is found only in the western part of the Upper Guinea forest block, stretching into Sierra Leone, Liberia and west Ivory Coast (Wilson & Reeder, 1993; East, 1996; Davies & Birkenhager, 1990; Wilson & Wilson, 1990). A first rough map representing its geographic range was acquired from Haltenorth & Diller (1980), later updated for Sierra Leone in accordance with Davies & Birkenhager (1990). A general revision was obtained using East (1990), while a preliminary output was revised by Dr. R. East (23 June '97) (Fig. 8.6.51.a).
Categorical-discrete (CD) distribution model
The species occurs primarily in forests, but can also utilise forest edges and forest mosaics (Davies & Birkenhager, 1990; East, 1990).
Based on these environmental preferences, the following scores were assigned (Fig. 8.6.51.b) (8.6.51.a):
|
Score |
|
|
1 |
Forests. |
|
2 |
Forest mosaics. |
|
3 |
Savannas and croplands. |
|
suitable |
moderately suitable |
unsuitable |
Total |
|
OCCURRENCE |
km2 |
% |
km2 |
% |
km2 |
% |
km2 |
% |
|
certain |
74 761 |
58 |
43 400 |
33 |
8 819 |
7 |
126 980 |
98 |
|
possible |
904 |
1 |
1 090 |
1 |
660 |
1 |
2 654 |
2 |
|
Total |
75 665 |
58 |
44 490 |
34 |
9 479 |
7 |
129 634 |
100 |
Tab 8.6.51.a: Cumulative size (km 2) of areas pertaining to each environmental suitability class within the Extent of Occurrence.
|
Number Patches (NP) |
Mean Patch Size (MPS) km2 |
Patch Size SD (PSSD) km2 |
Largest Patch Index (LPI) % |
Mean Shape Index (MSI) |
Area-Weighted Mean Shape Index (AWMSI) |
|
suitable |
51 |
1 471 |
9 693 |
58.27 |
1.58 |
15.02 |
|
moderately suitable |
161 |
280 |
1 537 |
14.44 |
1.4 |
6.84 |
|
Total AO |
8 |
15 016 |
38 963 |
98.31 |
1.91 |
5.31 |
Tab 8.6.51.b: Area of Occupancy fragmentation indexes.
Probabilistic-continuous (PC) distribution model
The output of the probabilistic-continuous (PC) distribution model is shown in Fig. 8.6.51.c.
Validation
No occurrence of the species within the four sample areas.
Comments and conservation issues
The small patches of EO in Sierra Leone are probably remnants of a former larger distribution, but their size poses a clear risk to the survival of the species there. The main part of the EO is in Liberia and Ivory Coast, but the suitable areas are only 39% of the total. Including the moderately suitable areas, however, raises the percentage of the AO to 74% of the EO. It is not highly fragmented as shown by the LPI (58.27%) and the relatively small number of patches. The AWMSI of the suitable areas indicates an intricate boundary of these areas, as expected where forest mosaics are interspersed with clearings and agricultural areas. About 5.5% of the AO is included in existing protected areas, and the species, due to the small AO and the intensive hunting and trapping, is correctly classified as Vulnerable.
|
OCCURRENCE |
SUITABILITY CLASS |
inside |
outside |
Total |
|
certain |
suitable |
3.41 |
54.26 |
57.67 |
|
moderately suitable |
1.87 |
31.61 |
33.48 |
|
unsuitable |
0.22 |
6.59 |
6.80 |
|
possible |
suitable |
0 |
0.70 |
0.70 |
|
moderately suitable |
0 |
0.84 |
0.84 |
|
unsuitable |
0 |
0.51 |
0.51 |
|
Total |
|
5.50 |
94.50 |
100 |
Tab 8.6.51.c: Percent of environmental suitability classes within EO (as obtained from the categorical-discrete distribution model) inside and outside the protected areas.
References
Davies A.G., Birkenhager B. (1990). Jentink's duiker in Sierra Leone: evidence from the Freetown Peninsula. Oryx: 24(3), 143-146.
East R. (Ed.) (1990). Antelopes Global Survey and Regional Action Plans. Part 3: West and Central Africa. IUCN/SSC Antelope Specialist Group.
East R. (Ed.) (1996). Antelope survey update. IUCN/SSC Antelope Specialist Group: n° 2.
Haltenorth T., Diller H. (1980). A field guide to the mammals of Africa, including Madagascar. Collins, London.
Kingdon J. (1997). The Kingdon field guide to African Mammals. Academic Press, London and New York: Natural World.
Meester J., Setzer H.W. (Eds) (1971). The Mammals of Africa, an Identification Manual. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C.
Wilson D.E., Reeder D.M. (Eds) (1993). Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. Second edition. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C.
Wilson V.J., Wilson B.L.P. (1990). Notes on the duikers of Sierra Leone. Arnoldia Zimbabwe: 9(33), 451-462.
|